Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

So you ban people because don't want them posting on your lj, and then you advertise that you had to ban them... iiiiinteresting.
gloating it cool? hehe.
We all gloat, so I suppose that's alright. I just wish you'd .. ya know... categorize what happened on my journal just a lil more accurately. You were offsides, and I said no. So I got banned because I won't let you anonymously flame a friend.
That's what I think I like about LJ
We all get to be Lords of Our own little Kindgdoms.
We are the most important thing in our own digital LJ worlds.
The biggest losers still get their chunk of LJ land and the coolest schmoes are just like the losers when you look at them all clumped together in binary.
It's like.. the great equalizer.

but not really


( 7 comments — Leave a comment )
Dec. 12th, 2001 03:41 pm (UTC)
You assume that was my IP. Posting of any IP is wrong. That was not a flame, I see quite entertaining parody there. You assume. assume. assume. I am insulted.

I do not associate with those who post IP's. I do not associate with those who assume with no evidence. I do not associate with dumbasses.
Dec. 12th, 2001 04:49 pm (UTC)
Posting anonymously in journals is cowardly. It's the action of someone who is inherently ashamed of what they have to say, or who fears retribution. Who in washington would feel the need to anonymously flame subbes? the ip is automatically displayed at the top of your message when you post anonymously in my journal. I don't disable anonymous posting (it's alright for some, but I think it's just another way of hiding from the world) but I *do* log IP adresses.
You are the one who commited the slight here.
It was indeed a flame, though you *did* at least refrain this time from calling anyone a moronic cunt, and at least it wasn't over their preference of OS.
You have a very healthy sense of outrage and insult. The world is always just coming down against you, you intrepid hero.
I don't associate with those who lack the courage of their convictions.
I don't associate with those who can't just stand up and say what they want without HIDING their identity when there is *absolutely* no need. You have no way of knowing how I, personally would react but I welcome a flame war in the comments long before I welcome anonymous cowards.
I do not associate with axe grinding malcontents who just need something to feel put upon about and need someone to beat up over it. You're a bully. Or you try to be, at least.
I do not associate with borederline sociopaths who can't be anything other than condescening, foul, purile, petty, vain, attention seeking and who display a pervasive and frightening lack of introspection.
You were added to my friends list (in return to you adding me) only because you occasionally had a very interesting or thought provoking post. You write well and I enjoyed your humor. However, since being counted amoung what you must see as your fans, I've had to admit that you're infantile to an extreme that's gotten more and more difficult to stomach.
In short, I'm glad you decided to remove me before I decided to remove you.
Dec. 12th, 2001 11:06 pm (UTC)
I like the way he explains it wasn't him then defends his posting it. MMmm.
Dec. 12th, 2001 09:15 pm (UTC)
That's what I think I like about LJ
We all get to be Lords of Our own little Kindgdoms.

Exactly. You can build your little realm where you have absolute control and don't have to tolerate dissent. You don't have to be logical, you don't have to be tolerant in any way, shape, or form. You can be the petty tyrant you always wanted.

It's all insecurity, though. Most of the people here seem to have this keen awareness of how little they matter in the grand scheme, of how socially adept they aren't, and try to avoid confronting that fact. Banning someone from your journal, deleting comments, all that online idiocy is just another way to avoid having someone point out the shortcomings you can't deal with.


Fuck 'em. That's what I say. Who wants to be a subject in that kind of petty kingdom?
Dec. 13th, 2001 12:45 am (UTC)
Oh, and if you want to call me a hypocrite right about now, that's fine.
Dec. 13th, 2001 09:24 am (UTC)
defensive much?
The reason I said "we ALL " get to be those kings instead of "The people who suck" get to is because we *all* do it.
For a lot of people this is one of the few places they can exercise control on their surroundings.

Dec. 13th, 2001 03:25 pm (UTC)
Not defensive at all. I was serious. I started thinking about the fact that it was me saying all that and I had a "d'oh" moment. I just try to be aware of when I'm doing it and avoid it.
( 7 comments — Leave a comment )


A Non-Newtonian Fluid

Latest Month

March 2010

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow