Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry


There's a story on tv about keeping kids safe from abduction, abuse, and harm in general by teaching them how to react to strangers and people who may want to harm them and how to read the signals given off by people who are attempting to hurt them.
All of this focus on strangers.
Then they follow up the story with "and Remember that most instances of abduction and abuse against children are commited by people they already know," thereby negating the importance of the story they just ran.

I'm sort of baffled by the way people exaggerate statistics and standards. Why are more people depressed and on prozac now than ever have been? Becuase depression as a psychological condition (a psychological condition that could be treated by anything other than a "buck up, friend") is new.
Why there all these new conditions and diseases? Are we really a more depressed society? A more anxious society? Why are so many people on MAOIs and SRIs?
It isn't because there's been an explosion in depression. It isn't because we're just *such* a screwed up society that more of us are screwed up.
It's becuase these drugs are new. The conditions we treat today with medication and therapy were just the way people were 50-70 years ago. You aren't happy? So what? most people aren't happy. You contemplate killing yourself? so what? most people want to die. That's just how it was. There was a 'suck it up and move on' attitude that we've lost. It's because the clasification of anxiety disorders, depression, borderline personalities, dysphoric disorders and the like are brand spanking new. It's becuase we've all got this kooky idea that they didn't have 50 years ago... the idea that we're *supposed* to be happy like the sitcom families, in love like the r&b ballads, and satisfied with our lives and our places in them like the cards at Hallmark.

Where the hell did we get that idea?
Why do we all of a sudden feel like we're not only capable of, but *entitled to* constant fulfillment? Who filled our heads with that bullshit?
As far as I can tell, it started in the 60s. At the same time we started rallying for civil rights, pushing for equality, getting the idea that we had the ability and the *right* to participate in our government more fully by any means necessary we went too far and decided that "pursuit of happiness" somehow meant "right to happiness" and when no one handed it to us... well... we made drugs to do it for us.

That's simplistic, I know. But I think it's somewhere in the right arena. Or at least a decent theory...


Aug. 9th, 2002 08:23 am (UTC)
Re: Er...
Oh. Then that's easy to reply to.

The reason why people know more about this is more than just self-help touchy feely hullabaloo, it's modern medicine evolving. It's safe to assume we know more about how the brain works and thus can identify stuff like depression much more easily, without all the stigma it used to have.
Aug. 9th, 2002 09:29 am (UTC)
Re: Er...
Again, I'm pretty sure I said that. That the drugs and the diagnoses are new, very new.

But I think that the reason who even thought to wonder if there might be a chemical reason for depression and anxiety is because we decided (or realized, if you prefer that word) that being depressed and being anxious wasn't a normal or healthy state for a person to be in.
That's a thought that wouldn't have occured to someone in the 50s. If you were depressed, you were just that sad, depressed guy. If you were anxious, you were just that worry wart everyone knew. There was no recourse for this and there was no *desire* for recourse because unless you were honestly acting insane no one thought to take you to a psychiatrist.

There had to be a shift in thinking to bring about the shift in medical treatment. There always is.

I thought this was a pretty simple statement. Heh. Guess not.


A Non-Newtonian Fluid

Latest Month

March 2010

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow