?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

I have too much estrogen (or whatever it is) for anyone's good.

I have this semi rant in my head that has fuck all to do with the above sentence about Eileen Wournos and serial killers in general and how first of all, most people don't understand that there's a murderer (someone who kills) and then there's a mass murderer (someone who kills a lot of people all at once) and then there's a spree killer (someone who kills a lot of people over the course of a sort of rampage, usually involving cross country travel and a lot of other crimes as well), and then WAAAAAY out away from all of them is a serial killer.

There's just too much to fit into a semi-sane entry. So I probably will never make that rant. Because in addition to people not understanding the difference between all of those things, I have even *more* issue with people who do, but then are fans. There's a difference between a big tongue in cheek membership in the Ed Gein fan club (Fun Fact: Ed Gein wasn't a serial killer by the FBI's standards of definition), and someone who is HONESTLY a *fan* of a serial killer.

You'll note that Dhamer lacks a huge following if you look around on the web. Bad jokes and 'good riddance' is all you'll see about him. About the same as Dennis Nielsen, his british counterpart. Dhamer wanted a live in love slave and so tried to lobotomize his victims, Nielsen just wanted someone to be a companion and so nicely killed and then kept his victims. Neither of them were 'out', both of them came from super masculine fathers who would have been horribly ashamed of their sexuality.
I have a theory that the reason the gay killers don't have as much of a fan following as the straight ones is that most of the serial killer fandom is actually pushed by *women* not men or boys.

It's hard to find someone to have an intelligent conversation about all this with. They're either fucking squicked by the whole thing (which I think is the more normal response), or they're a fan and think it's fucking cool that so and so did this or that. I used to think that this was becuase these people had never actually experience death. And in some cases I think that's part of it but then I think it has something to do a disconnect between real and 'it's only tv' that some people seem to have. and on and on and on.

and ya know what? This *wasn't* the rant. heh.

Comments

julianbashir
Mar. 9th, 2004 04:21 pm (UTC)
Here's a startling fact if you haven't heard of it: did you know that 73% of serial killers vote Republican? A serial killer, although a different animal initially from a "spree" killer like the DC sniper may commit spree-like killings towards the end when they get out of control and wants to kill everyday.

I wonder if Eileen Wournos talked about the Pacific Northwest as a breeding ground for serial killers.
maddening
Mar. 9th, 2004 08:47 pm (UTC)
actually, I hadn't heard that fact, but I don't think it's suprising either. John Wayne Gayce was a successful boy rapist and torturer because of the super conservative, cop buddy, pillar of the community he was on the surface, not because he was all that savvy of a killer.

And I agree about the spree killer note, the cycle starts speeding up, getting faster because the satisfaction just doesn't last as long, just like any addictive drug. I'd also say that some *start* as spree killers, like Richard Ramirez, killing for coke money.

Wisonsin is one of the most famous areas for serial killers. Its biggest stars being Gein (the grandfather of the movie madman) and Dahmer.


Profile

NewYorkNewYork
maddening
A Non-Newtonian Fluid

Latest Month

March 2010
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow